Wednesday, April 23, 2008

'American Idol' Tracker: Titans of song battle Andrew Lloyd Webber

Since the cornerstones of the Idoldome were set, it has been written that one day, six singers must pass this way before the show could fulfill its destiny.

In taking on the music of Andrew Lloyd Webber, "American Idol" came face to face with its spiritual creator, the man who elevated vocal performance to the level of spectacle. History has been filled with singing competitions, but until Lord Webber transformed the stage, the idea of singing as single combat -- a combat to master one’s soul and to enslave an audience -- would have been impossible.

But while "American Idol" may have been shaped in the passed-down image of the master, the show has needed time to work its way back to its creator, teaching its contestants to crawl before they can fly with pop tunes and songbook standards.

It is fitting then that now, seven years in, the strongest cast in "Idol" history should be chosen to fight this battle, gazing upon the unalloyed "Idol" text, opening the Arc of the Covenant and seeing whose heart is pure enough to stare into the face of creation.

And for this season, "Andrew Lloyd Webber night" will clearly mark the year’s definitional battle, the night which showed at last who is destined for "Idol" immortality (and the final three) and who has officially written a check their skills can’t pay. Some who faltered tonight will survive to fight on, but having glimpsed the eternal and fallen short, they will never walk with the pride of the innocent again.

As Lord Webber made clear, the challenge of tonight was not just to belt out “money notes,” but to connect with a song, with the character behind it and use it to tell a story. Raw vocal talent has gotten them all this far, to the dizzying heights of Idoldom, but to make these last steps will call for something much more scarier -- emotional depth.

It was a night of pomp in the Idoldome, with the harp-equipped band set up on stage. Music director Rickie Minor walked the floor in formal wear and His Lordship Himself joined us in the audience. As the evening turned out, His Lordship proved to be the greatest of Idol mentors. His Lordship actually worked with and shaped the contestants, to the point of demanding different songs, rather than merely dispensing good wishes as some previous mentors have contented themselves to do.

However, with the crowd near a fever pitch as the season enters the final stretch, tension hung in the air. The night opened with a rousing performance from Syesha Mercado -- enjoyable, and keeps her certainly alive, but ultimately, still lacking the intensity to take her all the way.

Jason Castro and Brooke White both showed that they have risen to about where they belong. Both had strong appeal in their niches and have won legions of admirers, but when this last push was demanded, it was a bridge too far. Brooke in particular, seems to have the Idoldome on edge with concern for her, her fragility so nakedly on display. After being upbraided by Paula for having to restart her version of "If You Love Me," one could have heard a false eyelash drop clear in the bleachers. Sadly, talented though she is, she gives the impression on coming undone in these recent weeks.

While challenges serve to bring some to their knees, they serve to bring out greatness in others. For the front-runners -- the two Davids -- they once again managed to inhabit their songs to a supernatural degree. But to the crowd, the night was a clear, unadulterated victory for this column’s candidate Carly Smithson, the most electrifying performer in "American Idol" history. Tonight at last, with "Jesus Christ Superstar," everything fell into place for Carly, and it is fitting that Idol’s spiritual godfather should have warned her off a major false step and guided her to her greatest success.

However, it must be said at this point that Carly cannot seem to get a break with the judges. Randy and Simon seem to be on a mission to deny her the just praise she deserves. Even on this night, while praising the brilliance of her work, their plaudits remained tempered, Randy claiming it wasn’t her best, and Simon delivering the very strange backhanded compliment that it was one of his favorites of the night (there had been all of four at this point).

While I will not demand an investigation yet, and while I support the constitutional right of judges to their opinions, I demand some sort of system of instant replays, or bonus voting be instituted to recompense Carly for an undue damage done to her prospects. But as ever, this column has complete faith in the wisdom of the electorate to make this right.

What is happening now to the contestants is that those who survive are completing the process of icon building. It is a source of fascination that in this era when fame is our ultimate commodity, the "Idol" stars draw more attention and fascination than any A-list screen actor. I recently heard of a story of one of this season’s survivors visiting a local Westside mall -- a showbiz-friendly locale where Brad and Angelina could go underwear shopping attracting barely a raised eyebrow -- and that the "Idol" was mobbed and gawked at by seemingly the entire place.

In a recent New Yorker essay on the changing nature of stardom, David Denby discusses how stars of yore, before we knew every intimate detail of the every actor’s life, became vessels for the roles they inhabited. He wrote: “At some point, however, an actor's looks and temperament would merge with a role that brought out, perhaps, an underlay of humor or menace, and the public would take notice, get excited, and the actor would become a star. The actor then imposed a unifying temperament on his characters; he became the characters, they became him, and any given performance offered a palimpsest of his past performances. Everything he had done since he assumed his ‘type’ trailed him like a ghost.”

In an era when we can recite more about our performers’ drunken debauchery then about what roles they have played, "American Idol" is the only star-making machine we have. It is the one place where those contestants, at least those savvy enough to feel their way through it, can -- on a stage that is at once public and yet controlled (not unlike the old studios) -- piece by piece, song by song, create personas for themselves as compelling to us today as the types inhabited by Bogart or Cary Grant in their time.

Through rigorous song choices, performances on stage and in the filmed glimpses they offer into their families and homes, these singers can create characters that become bigger than their mortal shells. And each time they sing a number that touches the audience, that impact serves to make the persona grow and grow.

In confronting Lord Webber, the final six had their greatest opportunity yet to draw a richer, deeper shaper to their persona, and for those who rose to their challenge, they are on the cusp of a place where their stars are about to soar into the heavens to sit among the immortals evermore.

Special Note: Please join me for an online chat tomorrow (Wednesday) at noon PDT at chat.latimes.com

Source: latimesblogs.latimes.com

Low-cost carriers from emerging markets struggle to reach profitability

The low-cost carrier sector has boomed, driven by growth in emerging markets. So far there have been remarkably few casualties despite a lack of profitability, but how many will survive?

Low-cost carriers seem to spread like wildfire. Last year they transported more than 550 million passengers, an increase of 24% compared with 2006. There are now more than 100 low-cost carriers, 65 of which have launched over the last four years. A majority of the start-ups have cropped up in emerging markets, in particular Asia, where low-cost carriers grew 35% last year and now account for 19% of the world's total low-cost market. Since 2004, 28 carriers have launched low-cost operations in the Asia-Pacific region, 18 in Europe, 11 in the Americas, five in ­Africa and three in the Middle East.

But unfortunately low-cost carriers have failed to turn the traffic increases into profit gains. While nearly every low-cost carrier in the top 15 continues to turn healthy profits, most of the sector is struggling to post sustainable margins. In several regions which have seen a sudden spurt of low cost activity this decade, such as Eastern Europe and South Asia, no one is making any money yet. But incredibly there have hardly been any casualties in these and other emerging markets. With the industry likely on the cusp of a global downturn, oil prices reaching record highs and capital markets tightening due to the credit crunch, will this be the year of massive consolidation and fallout?

There have already been four low-cost ­carrier casualties this year - Indonesia's Adam Air, Oasis Hong Kong and US-based ATA and Skybus. Another US low-cost carrier, Frontier Airlines, filed for bankruptcy in April and two budget carriers in the fiercely competitive Spanish market, Clickair and Vueling, will likely merge. Observers expect more casualties but mainly in Europe and North America, saying Adam's problems were unique in an otherwise promising Indonesian market and Oasis was an exception because it was the only low-cost carrier operating on sectors of over 10 hours.

"There will be more carnage in the mature markets and less carnage in the emerging markets because there are more opportunities in the emerging markets," predicts Seabury Group managing director Joseph Schottland.

In fact, most low-cost carriers in developing markets do not seem overly concerned about the looming global downturn. They are confident their markets will continue to grow even if Europe and North America enter a recession. "For first time ever if the US sneezes, Asia won't catch a cold," says Tony Davis, chief ­executive of Singapore-based Tiger Airways.

Adds the chief executive of Thai low-cost carrier Nok Air, Patee Sarasin: "The recession may not hit Thailand. At the moment we're pretty well off."

India's economy is also continuing to grow at 10% annually, says Air Deccan chief executive Ramki Sundaram. "At the end of the day the Indian middle class is still 200-odd million people and Indian domestic demand is still ­robust. The economy is still growing," he says.

Sundaram points out that India's low-cost market remains in the infancy stage and, unlike mature low-cost markets such as Europe, will grow through a recession. Schottland agrees, saying the penetration of low-cost carriers in Asia is still only half that which low-cost ­carriers have achieved in the USA and Europe.

SkyEurope chief executive Jason Bitter believes Eastern Europe can also escape a potential global downturn relatively unscathed. "We have two markets that even in a recession will grow," he says, referring to SkyEurope's home base of Bratislava in Slovakia and Prague in the neighbouring Czech Republic.

Bitter adds that even if a recession impacts some of its spokes in Western Europe and its third base, which is in Vienna, SkyEurope could benefit because low-cost carriers have historically attracted more business travellers during recessions. "We are positioned to take advantage of a recession," he says.

Tiger's Davis agrees: "Generally, well-run, efficient low-cost carriers better weather these storms [than full-service carriers] because there is a trading down" by consumers.

Mango chief executive Nico Bezuidenhout also predicts "a migration to low-cost carriers and more price sensitivity in the business market" in Mango's home market South Africa. He says growth in South Africa's domestic market may slow from about 20% annually to 10-12% but the country's three low-cost carriers could see their market share increase significantly. "A recession in a twisted way is advantageous to low-cost carriers," Bezuidenhout says.

He adds that a downturn could also help free up aircraft for carriers like Mango, which has struggled to secure additional Boeing 737-800s at reasonable rates. "The lease rates in my view are at an all-time high," Bezuidenhout says. "The market is bound to turn down."

AirAsia chief executive Tony Fernandes says the other "silver lining" in a recession is oil prices may finally start to fall. "Obviously we will benefit from a recession," he says.

A recession, however, will likely have a slowing effect on start-up activity. For the last several years entrepreneurs proposing new low-cost carriers for emerging markets have had little trouble securing capital. But Seabury chief executive John Luth says investment firms in recent months have become more reluctant to invest in low-cost carriers and more selective in choosing which start-ups to back. "Attracting capital for today versus three years ago for low-cost carriers is more difficult. But there are exceptions," he says.

Start-up activity

Luth adds that there are still plenty of business proposals out there but they are now unlikely to see the light of day, unless they are in a market where there is still a lot of untapped potential and are backed by seasoned industry executives like JetBlue founder David Neeleman, who earlier this year secured capital that will be used to launch a new Brazilian carrier in 2009. "You need a very significant niche in a good market," Luth says. "There is equity out there but you need a solid, well thought-out plan."

Michael Coltman, co-founder of UK-based low-cost carrier advisory firm Mango Aviation Partners, adds: "Investors are more savvy now. It's no longer a license to print money. You need to have the right management."

The chief executive of Poland's Centralwings, Waldemar Krolikowski, says it has also become more difficult for established low-cost carriers to secure additional capital. "For the time being it's not easy to convince banks that aviation or carrying passengers is a good business. They can see aviation is not such a good business after all," he says.

Centralwings has been struggling to compete against Western European low-cost carriers and earlier this year pulled out of several routes. Krolikowski says the carrier wants to escape the "violent competition" in the scheduled market and focus more on charters, but will need more capital to support expansion under its revised business plan. "We definitely need more capital like any entity that wants to grow up," he says. "I'm trying to find a more profitable market. At the time being it's very difficult and very competitive because a lot of big players are in this market."

Krolikowski adds that Centralwings has been trying to secure additional funding from Polish banks but recently the reception has not been too positive. Most low-cost carriers in emerging markets, however, do not seem too concerned about the prospect of running out of cash. Says the chief executive of Indonesia's Mandala, Warwick Brady: "We may need to raise more capital [but] our owners have invested real heavily in us and see a good future for Mandala.

"We are not profitable but we are on our way," adds Brady, who joined Mandala from Deccan last year to help restructure the carrier and lead a fleet renewal. "With 240 million people and a low cost base there's a lot of ­opportunity here."

He adds that Mandala is the only Indonesian carrier with an international investor, which gives the carrier "a good foundation". Indigo Partners, a US investment firm founded by Bill Franke and David Bonderman in 2002, acquired a 49% stake in Mandala in late 2006. Indigo also has stakes in Tiger and Hungarian low-cost carrier Wizz Air and, according to Brady, is still "looking at airline opportunities but is picky with who it invests in".

Bitter is also confident SkyEurope can ­secure more capital if necessary, even though the carrier has incurred over $150 million in losses over the last five years. "I think we can find capital. It's not easy to get in this environment and we don't want to ask, but I think it won't be a problem for us," he says. "We have some strong shareholders backing us [and] we're showing real continued improvements on an ongoing basis."

He points out that SkyEurope halved its losses from $71 million for the last fiscal year to $32 million for the fiscal year ending 30 September 2007. Bitter says the carrier is on track for another 50% improvement for the current fiscal year.

"If I had last year's fuel price we'd be a profitable airline now," says Bitter, who has overseen a drastic restructuring plan since taking over as chief executive one year ago. "We're not far away. We're closer."

Elusive profits

Sundaram is also confident Deccan, which seems to compete neck and neck every year with SkyEurope for the prize of world's most unprofitable low-cost airline, can secure more capital. He says the carrier's board has just approved the provision for another $400 million in capital and Deccan is now looking to secure these funds. "The capital situation is much different than it was one year back," ­Sundaram says. "The overall worldwide ­capital market is very unpredictable. At this stage the availability of capital is not ­something you can take for granted."

Deccan has chalked up nearly $300 million in losses over the last two years, including a $64 million loss in the quarter ending 30 ­September 2007. Sundaram says Deccan is continuing to incur losses at a similar rate this year despite a restructuring initiated last summer, after Kingfisher Airlines parent UB Group became Deccan's largest shareholder and Sundaram was promoted to chief executive. In ­recent months Deccan has slowed capacity growth, restructured its network, increased its focus on revenue management and turned off its cheapest fare bucket. Sundaram says revenues and yields have already improved significantly, "but over the same period oil prices have shot up so it's a zero sum game".

He adds: "Our focus is to get to profitability soonest. In earlier phases the strategy was to get as much market share as possible."

It has taken Deccan only five years to build up a 15% share of the domestic market, which tops India's other low-cost carriers, but it has been an expensive mission. Like other Indian low-cost carriers, Deccan has partly funded its unprofitable operations through the sale-and-leasebacks of aircraft. Sundaram says Deccan has sold for a profit and leased back most of the 23 A320s in its fleet. Rivals Indigo and SpiceJet have done the same with their fleets of nearly 20 A320s and 20 737s, respectively. Bitter and Davis say SkyEurope and Tiger have also benefited from sale-and-leasebacks.

Luth says sale-leasebacks "have been a very substantial source of capital" for several carriers in emerging markets and "it has funded a lot of loss-making low-cost carriers". He says some low-cost carriers have also profited from selling aircraft back to the manufacturer, which in the current market is able to place the aircraft with another carrier for a higher price, and from selling aircraft to another carrier through an intermediary. But Luth adds that carriers may find it harder to do this as the aircraft market starts to shift. He says ­already lessors are more reluctant to do sale-and-leasebacks because they fear aircraft prices may start to go down again.

"There's an effort by lessors to be more careful in what they are doing," says Sundaram, who before joining Deccan worked in ­aircraft and aviation financing for South ­African banking group Investec. "There is a nervousness around."

Lion Air chief executive Rusdi Kirana also says it has become more difficult to finance aircraft but claims so far he has not had problems financing any of the 178 737-900ERs Lion has ordered from Boeing. "There is a change - they are being more selective. If you check with the bankers it is only Lion Air which has gotten financing in Indonesia [for new aircraft] up to today, and it is because we are proven and we are a successful airline," Rusdi says. "We have good growth in our company and good profits and the banks are confident in us."

Lion now operates nine 737-900ERs and Rusdi says new deliveries have already been financed through August. He expects financing covering deliveries up to 2010 to be finalised within the next month or two. "We have the largest market share in Indonesia so we have not had any problems," he says.

Sundaram says Deccan is confident it can conclude sale-and-leaseback deals for the four A320s scheduled for delivery later this year. Sundaram adds that while Deccan has benefited from selling A320s at a profit, it has also tried to keep lease rates low and in the last year the profits realised from sale-and-leasebacks have not been significant "in the big scheme of things".

The chief executive of India's GoAir, Edgardo Badiali, says the danger is that low-cost carriers with very large orders such as Deccan, Indigo and Lion could find themselves forced to take aircraft in a market that is already oversaturated. "If suddenly the market for aircraft isn't there you have a big problem," he says.

Badiali says GoAir, which so far has only ordered 20 A320s compared to the 100 ordered by Indigo and the nearly 100 initially ordered by Deccan, has resisted ordering more aircraft over the last year because it believes other carriers have over-ordered and new aircraft prices will start to come down. With only six aircraft GoAir is now by far the smallest of India's six low-cost carriers but Badiali says this is by design. "We believe it is much better to have a more sustainable growth and position the company to be there when the time is right. We have a more conservative strategy and we think that's the right strategy," he says. "This is just the beginning of a long journey. The penetration of the market is just beginning."

Thai growth slows

Thailand has seen an explosion of low-cost activity since the end of 2004, when One-Two-Go became the country's first low-cost carrier. By mid-2005 two more low-cost carriers launched, Thai AirAsia and Nok Air, marking a remarkable shift for a relatively small domestic market that had been controlled by flag carrier Thai Airways and a few small regional players.

The Thai market has since tripled in size from about four million passengers annually to more than 12 million, with the three low-cost carriers accounting last year for 8.5 million. But while all three of the new-entrants were profitable in 2006, last year was difficult and the first quarter of 2008 was even harsher as fuel prices increased further.

"Not many people are making money to be honest," says Nok chief executive Patee Sarasin. "The fuel price has gone up to a point where the market wasn't prepared."

He adds Thai carriers are constrained because it is difficult to pass on fare increases without significantly impacting demand. "What we have to overcome in Thailand is the fares. The load factor is great. It's been 80% the last few months."

Patee says the fares over the last year have been irrational and there is now a 200 baht ($7) gap per ticket that needs to be overcome for Thailand's low-cost carriers to be in the black.

He says Nok is now trying to increase its fares by focusing more on the business market through the launch of a corporate programme. It is also focusing on ancillaries and will begin selling holiday packages on its website later this year. Nok, which increased its Boeing 737-400 fleet last year from five to nine aircraft, is also slowing down growth and will not add capacity this year.

AirAsia Group chief executive Tony Fernandes says Thai AirAsia has also put a brake on expansion and will not expand its fleet this year. Instead the carrier will focus on getting rid of its remaining 737-300s in favour of new, more fuel efficient Airbus A320s.

In February Thai AirAsia, which operates 16 aircraft, said it ended 2007 slightly in the red. Fernandes says the carrier and AirAsia's other affiliate, Indonesia AirAsia, are now at roughly break even.

Profits in singapore in short supply

Singapore witnessed a sudden spurt of low-cost activity back in 2004 with the launch of three carriers, but the market has been slow to mature due largely to restricted bilaterals in the region, and none of the carriers were profitable in the first three years. Over the last year some profitability has finally been achieved, but the margins are not yet sustainable and Singapore's low-cost carriers are still relatively small.

The largest, Tiger Airways, only operates eight Airbus A320s with another four at its new Australian subsidiary. Tiger in January said it was profitable for the nine-month period ending 31 December, but chief executive Tony Davis in an interview in April refused to say if the carrier ended its fiscal year in the black and acknowledged the quarter ending 31 March was tough: "The quarter definitely was difficult due to the impact of fuel but we think we definitely performed better than our competitors.

"We're comfortable with our business plan. We believe our year-end results for Singapore will be in line with forecast and show solid improvement in the business."

He adds the Singapore operation is now cash flow positive and the Australian operation "has been cash positive from the start". He claims the launch of Tiger Australia was entirely funded by cash and Tiger has been able to expand with only the S$24 million in capital initially provided by its investors, which include the family of Ryanair founder Tony Ryan. "We haven't asked shareholders for cash since October 2005 and we don't foresee going back to our investors anytime soon," Davis says. "We've managed our cash flows very successfully. We've been able to grow the business by not asking shareholders for more capital."

The chief executive of Singapore's other two low-cost carriers, Jetstar Asia and Valuair, Chong Phit Lian says their parent company, Orangestar, has just completed its first profitable year. Chong says Orangestar turned only "a very modest profit" in the fiscal year ending 31 March 2008 but this is a major improvement compared to the losses incurred since Orangestar was created in 2005 from the merger of Jetstar and Valuair. "Within three years we have turned around the company," she says. "Our loads have gone up and we've given up some high loss making routes."

Jetstar Asia and Valuair have been focusing on reducing their cost base and have taken a very conservative approach to expansion. The carriers' combined fleet of seven A320s is slightly smaller than when they merged in 2005 but they have been improving aircraft utilisation. "If there is a business case for it we'll go for more aircraft," Chong says.

Source: flightglobal.com

Study: BitTorrent sees big growth, LimeWire still #1 P2P app

Last week, the Digital Music News Research Group released its quarterly P2P report. The for-pay report covers the fourth quarter of 2007, but a publicly available excerpt breaks down the data for the period between September 2006 and September 2007. The data consists of snapshots of P2P application and protocol use collected from over 1.66 million Windows PCs. Gnutella is still the top P2P network, but BitTorrent has been steadily rising.

LimeWire still rules the P2P world. It is by far the most popular single P2P application, appearing on 36.4 percent of the machines surveyed as of last September. LimeWire also accounts for the overwhelming majority of Gnutella use among the top 13 of the 152 applications found on PCs. Gnutella was the protocol of choice for 40.5 percent of the PCs at the end of the period covered by the survey.

We reported last week that BitTorrent use jumped nearly 25 percent on average between November 2007 and March 2008, and the data in the Digital Music News Research Group shows some significant growth for BitTorrent in the previous period. In September 2006, 23.6 percent of the top 13 P2P apps used BitTorrent. A year later, that number grew over 19 percent, to 28.2 percent.

There also appears to be some consolidation in the P2P market. In September 2006, the top 13 applications accounted for 72.8 percent of the market. A year later, that number had grown to nearly 80 percent. After LimeWire, the most popular P2P application is µTorrent, followed by BitTorrent, Ares, and Azureus. µTorrent's popularity soared during the survey period, with its market share growing from 3.0 percent in September 2006 to 11.3 percent a year later.

Two new applications showed up in the survey beginning in January 2007. P4P codeveloper Pando, whose technology will be used by NBC for content distribution, had its software first show up in the survey in May; it captured 0.9 percent of the P2P software market in September 2007. Similarly, Gnutella client Frostwire started with 0.4 percent of the market in January 2007 and grew to 1.2 percent by September.

Although BitTorrent is growing at a faster pace than Gnutella, LimeWire may continue to be the most popular application due to its recent addition of support for BitTorrent transfers. LimeWire faces a troubled future, however, due to an ongoing legal battle with the RIAA. The RIAA sued the P2P provider in August 2006, and LimeWire's countersuit alleging conspiracy on the part of the record labels was dismissed this past December.

Vilified by Big Content and some ISPs, BitTorrent clearly has the momentum right now. "All of the P2P growth we've seen over the past several months is in the torrent community," metrics firm BigChampagne CEO Eric Garland told Ars earlier this month.

P2P traffic has been increasingly shifting away from music towards TV and movies, and BitTorrent is much better suited to moving around the multiple-episode packs to TV shows that BigChampagne has seen growing in popularity. Feature films are also popular—Garland told Ars that the top 100 movies on BitTorrent saw swarms of 3.9 million users in November 2007, compared with 9.8 million in March 2008.

Source: arstechnica.com

Paul McCartney Sparks Engagement Rumors?

Paul McCartney has sparked engagement rumors after he was spotted shopping at a top London jeweler. The former Beatle was snapped by photographers shopping at exclusive New Bond Street store S.J. Phillips yesterday - fueling speculation he is to propose to American heiress Nancy Shevell.

The 65-year-old recently returned from a romantic Caribbean vacation with Shevell after settling his $48.6 million divorce from estranged wife Heather Mills last month. The pair was spotted getting close on the beach of a private resort - splashing out on a $12,000 -a-night villa, enjoying hand-in-hand walks along the coast, a sailing trip and frolics in the sea.

And now, the Mull of Kintyre hit-maker seems to have taken the relationship to another level with his jewelry store jaunt. S.J. Phillips confirmed McCartney was shopping at the store - but refused to say what the singer purchased during his visit.

Source: starpulse.com

Generous Gwyneth

Generous Gwyneth Paltrow donated $75,000 to the Food Bank for New York City at a celebrity-studded benefit held for the organization on Saturday.

The actress, an honoree at the event, dug into her own deep pockets to match the sum raised at the bash.

She told guests, "I've been thinking about all the crap my children have and how much food we throw away. We have to do better."

The Food Bank distributes free food to over 1.5 million hungry New Yorkers every year.

Source: starpulse.com

Celebrity Birthdays, April 23

Happy Birthday to Slovakian tennis player Daniela Hantuchova (1983), "Sin City" actress Jamie King (1979), WWE champ John Cena (1977), Mexican singer Patricia Manterola (1972), "CSI NY" actress Melina Kanakaredes (1967), sitcom actor George Lopez (1961), Def Leppard guitarist Steve Clark (1960; d. 1991), "One Day At A Time" actress Valerie Bertinelli (1960), filmmaker Michael Moore (1954), "Three's Company" star Joyce DeWitt (1949), actress Sandra Dee (1942; d. 2005), "The Six Million Dollar Man" star Lee Majors (1939), singer/songwriter Roy Orbison (1936; d. 1988), American singer Ray Peterson (1935; d. 2005), musician Bunky Green (1935), legendary child actress Shirley Temple (1928), baseball legend Warren Spahn (1921; d. 2003), French actress Simone Simon (1910; d. 2005), film director Frank Borzage (1893; d. 1952), 15th President of the United States James Buchanan (1791; d. 1868), and prolific English playwright William Shakespeare (1564; d. ca. 1616).


Source: starpulse.com

LimeWire version 4.16.7

LimeWire PRO get turbo-charged

Fastest P2P downloads on the planet
No spyware, adware, or bundled software
Built-in media player
Downloads from multiple hosts
International versions
Windows, Mac and Linux compatible

Optimized search results
Turbo-charged downloads
Connections to more sources
More Reliable Downloads
Special PRO only skin
FREE tech support
FREE updates for up to 6 months

Get Pro for a single payment of only $21.95

Extend your PRO benefits!
Get PRO for 1 year for only $34.95!

limewire.com